Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes

dc.contributor.authorNora Fagerholm
dc.contributor.authorMario Torralba
dc.contributor.authorGerardo Moreno
dc.contributor.authorMarco Girardello
dc.contributor.authorFelix Herzog
dc.contributor.authorStephanie Aviron
dc.contributor.authorPaul Burgess
dc.contributor.authorJosep Crous-Duran
dc.contributor.authorNuria Ferreiro-Domínguez
dc.contributor.authorAnil Gravesh
dc.contributor.authorTibor Hartel
dc.contributor.authorVlad Măcicăsan
dc.contributor.authorSonja Kay
dc.contributor.authorAnastasia Pantera
dc.contributor.authorAnna Varga
dc.contributor.authorTobias Plieninger
dc.contributor.organizationfi=maantiede|en=Geography |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.17647764921
dc.converis.publication-id40476052
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/40476052
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:20:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:20:34Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Rural development policies in many Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries promote sustainable landscape management with the intention of providing multiple ecosystem services (ES). Yet, it remains unclear which ES benefits are perceived in different landscapes and by different people. We present an assessment of ES benefits perceived and mapped by residents (n = 2,301) across 13 multifunctional (deep rural to peri-urban) landscapes in Europe. We identify the most intensively perceived ES benefits, their spatial patterns, and the respondent and landscape characteristics that determine ES benefit perception. We find outdoor recreation, aesthetic values and social interactions are the key ES benefits at local scales. Settlement areas are ES benefit hotspots but many benefits are also related to forests, waters and mosaic landscapes. We find some ES benefits (e.g. culture and heritage values) are spatially clustered, while many others (e.g. aesthetic values) are dispersed. ES benefit perception is linked to people’s relationship with and accessibility to a landscape. Our study discusses how a local perspective can contribute to the development of contextualized and socially acceptable policies for sustainable ES management. We also address conceptual confusion in ES framework and present argumentation regarding the links from services to benefits, and from benefits to different types of values.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange134
dc.format.pagerange147
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9495
dc.identifier.jour-issn0959-3780
dc.identifier.olddbid175965
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/159059
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/30380
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824144
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorFagerholm, Nora
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geosciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1172 Environmental sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline1172 Ympäristötiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002
dc.relation.ispartofjournalGlobal Environmental Change
dc.relation.volume56
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/159059
dc.titleCross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Global_Environmental_Change_2019_preprint_version.pdf
Size:
1.84 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Preprint