Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital

dc.contributor.authorHannula Ossi
dc.contributor.authorMustonen Anssi
dc.contributor.authorRautiainen Suvi
dc.contributor.authorVanninen Ritva
dc.contributor.authorHyppölä Harri
dc.contributor.organizationfi=sisätautioppi|en=Internal Medicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code2607318
dc.converis.publication-id59858955
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/59858955
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:33:06Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:33:06Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background:</strong> The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether diagnosing a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in primary health care using limited compression ultrasound (LCUS) can save resources compared to referring these patients to hospital. According to the current literature, LCUS is as safe as a standard protocol based on a whole-leg ultrasound (US).</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We created a standardized patient for this cost-analysis model based on 76 patients that were referred to hospital for a suspected DVT. Travel distance to the health care centre and hospital was calculated based on the home address. Hospital costs were acquired from the hospital price list and Finnish legislation. Time spent in the hospital was retrieved from hospital statistics. Time spent in the health care centre and travelling were estimated and monetized based on average salary. The cost of participating physicians attending a US training course was estimated based on the national average salary of a general practitioner as well as the course participation fee. A cost-minimization modeling was performed for this standardized patient comparing the total costs, including private and public costs, of standard and LCUS strategies.<br></p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The total costs per patient of standard and LCUS pathways were 1151.52€ and 301.94€ [difference 849.59€ (95% CI 800.21€-898.97€, <em>p</em> < 0.001)], respectively. The real-life costs of these strategies, considering that some patients are probably referred to hospital every year and including training costs, are 1151.53€ and 508.69€ [difference 642.84€ (95% CI 541.85€-743.82€)], respectively.<br></p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Using LCUS in diagnosing DVT in primary health care instead of referring these patients to the hospital is shown to save a significant amount of public and private resources.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn2524-8987
dc.identifier.jour-issn2524-8987
dc.identifier.olddbid204176
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/187203
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/52388
dc.identifier.urlhttps://theultrasoundjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13089-021-00227-5
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021093048858
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMustonen, Anssi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.publisher.countryItalyen_GB
dc.publisher.countryItaliafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeIT
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 26
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s13089-021-00227-5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalUltrasound Journal
dc.relation.volume13
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/187203
dc.titleCost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s13089-021-00227-5.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF