University teachers' profiles based on digital innovativeness and instructional adaptation to COVID-19: Association with learning patterns and teacher demographics

dc.contributor.authorAldahdouh Tahani Z.
dc.contributor.authorMurtonen Mari
dc.contributor.authorRiekkinen Jere
dc.contributor.authorVilppu Henna
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Trang
dc.contributor.authorNokelainen Petri
dc.contributor.organizationfi=opettajankoulutuslaitos (Turku)|en=Department of Teacher Education (Turku)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.17986072860
dc.converis.publication-id179529482
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/179529482
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:43:07Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:43:07Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The purpose of this study was to understand the factors behind university teachers' ability to implement instructional changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An online questionnaire comprised of open-ended and Likert-scale questions was administered to teachers at a Finnish university in April 2020. The sample consisted of 378 university teachers who were categorised into four groups based on their digital innovativeness and the extent to which they implemented changes to adapt their teaching practices to COVID-19 restrictions: Avoider Survival Adapters, Avoider Ambitious Adapters, Embracer Survival Adapters, and Embracer Ambitious Adapters. We examined the association between the teacher groups and their learning patterns and background characteristics. The findings showed that Embracer Ambitious Adapters have significantly more meaning-oriented and application-oriented learning patterns than Embracer Survival Adapters, though Avoider Survival Adapters have more problematic learning patterns. Furthermore, the results indicated that pedagogical training and having more teaching experience helped innovative teachers embrace more changes in their teaching practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. In terms of discipline, the results showed that teachers working in hard disciplines (e.g., physics) were more likely to belong to the Embracer Survival Adapters group, while teachers working in soft disciplines (e.g., history) were more likely to belong to the Embracer Ambitious Adapters group. Possible interpretations of these findings and perspectives for further research are discussed.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7608
dc.identifier.jour-issn1360-2357
dc.identifier.olddbid204485
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/187512
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/52887
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-023-11748-y
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023051844965
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMurtonen, Mari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVilppu, Henna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorNguyen, Trang
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRiekkinen, Jere
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10639-023-11748-y
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEducation and Information Technologies
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/187512
dc.titleUniversity teachers' profiles based on digital innovativeness and instructional adaptation to COVID-19: Association with learning patterns and teacher demographics
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
MurtonenEtAl2023UniversityTeachersProfiles.pdf
Size:
813.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format