Practical nurse students’ misconceptions about infection prevention and control

dc.contributor.authorEronen Riikka
dc.contributor.authorHelle Laura
dc.contributor.authorPalonen Tuire
dc.contributor.authorBoshuizen Henny P. A.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kasvatustieteiden tiedekunta|en=Faculty of Education|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=opettajankoulutuslaitos (Turku)|en=Department of Teacher Education (Turku)|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=opettajankoulutuslaitos|en=Department of Teacher Education|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.17986072860
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.48852235281
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.84451888758
dc.contributor.organization-code2604201
dc.converis.publication-id181370345
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/181370345
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T13:32:10Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T13:32:10Z
dc.description.abstract<p>When teaching infection prevention and control (IPC), nursing education tends to focus on skills and fostering good practice rather than challenging students’ thinking. Therefore, students’ misconceptions about IPC receive less attention than they deserve. The purpose of the study was to make an inventory of student nurses’ misconceptions about IPC before instruction and to make these misconceptions visible to teachers. The study was conducted in one vocational institute in Finland and is based on the answers of 29 practical nurse students before IPC training. The students took an online test requiring them to justify their answers to two multiple-true–false questions: 1) What is the main route of transmission between patients in healthcare facilities, and 2) What is the most effective and easiest manner to prevent the spreading of pathogens, e.g., multi-resistant bacteria in long-term care facilities? Analysis of the students’ written justifications resulted in three mental models: 1) the Household Hygiene Model manifesting lay knowledge learned in domestic situations, 2) the Mixed Model consisting of lay knowledge, enriched with some professional knowledge of IPC, and 3) the Transmission Model manifesting a professional understanding of IPC. The first two mental models were considered to be misconceptions. Only one of the participants showed a professional understanding (i.e., the Transmission Model). To conclude, student nurses manifested systematic patterns of misconceptions before instruction. Unless the students are confronted with their misconceptions of IPC during instruction, it is likely that these misconceptions will impede their learning or make learning outcomes transient.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1874-7868
dc.identifier.jour-issn1874-785X
dc.identifier.olddbid213054
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/196072
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54641
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12186-023-09337-8
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790759
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorEronen, Riikka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHelle, Laura
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPalonen, Tuire
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBoshuizen, Els
dc.okm.discipline316 Nursingen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline316 Hoitotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Link
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s12186-023-09337-8
dc.relation.ispartofjournalVocations and Learning
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/196072
dc.titlePractical nurse students’ misconceptions about infection prevention and control
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s12186-023-09337-8.pdf
Size:
1.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format