Cost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being and safety promotion: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorHult Marja
dc.contributor.authorHalminen Olli
dc.contributor.authorLinna Miika
dc.contributor.authorSuominen Sakari
dc.contributor.authorKangasniemi Mari
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hoitotieteen laitos|en=Department of Nursing Science|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kansanterveystiede|en=Public Health|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.27201741504
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.94792640685
dc.converis.publication-id68461312
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/68461312
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:28:24Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:28:24Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Background<br>The health, well-being and safety of the general population are important goals for society, but forecasting outcomes and weighing up the costs and benefits of effective promotional programmes is challenging. This study aimed to identify and describe the cost-effectiveness calculators that analyze interventions that promote health, well-being and safety.<br>Methods<br>Our systematic review used the CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, EconLit, PubMed and Scopus databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English between January 2010 and April 2020. The data were analyzed with narrative synthesis.<br>Results<br>The searches identified 6880 papers and nine met our eligibility and quality criteria. All nine calculators focussed on interventions that promoted health and well-being, but no safety promotion tools were identified. Five calculators were targeted at group-level initiatives, two at regional levels and two at national levels. The calculators combined different data sources, in addition to data inputted by users. This included empirical research and previous literature. The calculators created baseline estimates and assessed the cost-effectiveness of the interventions before or after they were implemented. The calculators were heterogeneous in terms of outcomes, the interventions they evaluated and the data and methods used.<br>Conclusion<br>This review identified nine calculators that assessed the cost-effectiveness of health and well-being interventions and supported decision-making and resource allocations at local, regional and national levels, but none focussed on safety. Producing calculators that work accurately in different contexts might be challenging. Further research should identify how to assess sustainable evaluation of health, well-being and safety strategies.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange1003
dc.format.pagerange997
dc.identifier.eissn1464-360X
dc.identifier.jour-issn1101-1262
dc.identifier.olddbid176653
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/159747
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/32203
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab068
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022012710688
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHult, Marja
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSuominen, Sakari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKangasniemi, Mari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline316 Nursingen_GB
dc.okm.discipline316 Hoitotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1093/eurpub/ckab068
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEuropean Journal of Public Health
dc.relation.issue5
dc.relation.volume31
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/159747
dc.titleCost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being and safety promotion: a systematic review
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
ckab068.pdf
Size:
420.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s PDF