Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study

dc.contributor.authorNikander Kirsi
dc.contributor.authorKosola Silja
dc.contributor.authorVahlberg Tero
dc.contributor.authorKaila Minna
dc.contributor.authorHermanson Elina
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biostatistiikka|en=Biostatistics|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.89365200099
dc.converis.publication-id175066992
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/175066992
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:36:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:36:34Z
dc.description.abstract<p><b>Background </b>The benefits of school doctor interventions conducted at routine general health checks remain insufficiently studied. This study explored the associations of school doctor interventions with the doctor-evaluated and parent-evaluated benefits of routine health checks.<br></p><p><b>Methods </b>Between August 2017 and August 2018, we recruited a random sample of 1341 children from grades 1 and 5 from 21 Finnish elementary schools in 4 municipalities. Doctors routinely examined all children, who were accompanied by parents. The doctor-reported interventions were categorised into six groups: instructions and/or significant discussions, prescriptions, laboratory tests and/or medical imaging, scheduling of follow-up appointments, referrals to other professionals and referrals to specialised care. Doctors evaluated the benefit of the appointment using predetermined criteria, and parents provided their subjective perceptions of benefit. Interventions and reported benefit were compared using multilevel logistic regression.<br></p><p><b>Results </b>Doctors reported 52% and parents 87% of the appointments with interventions beneficial. All interventions were independently associated with doctor-evaluated benefit (ORs: 1.91-17.26). Receiving any intervention during the appointment was associated with parent-evaluated benefit (OR: 3.25, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.75). In analyses of different interventions, instructions and/or significant discussions (OR: 1.71, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.44), prescriptions (OR: 7.44, 95% CI 2.32 to 23.91) and laboratory tests and/or medical imaging (OR: 3.38, 95% CI 1.34 to 8.55) were associated with parent-evaluated benefit. Scheduled follow-up appointments and referrals to other professionals showed no significant association with parent-evaluated benefit.<br></p><p><b>Conclusions </b>Doctors and parents valued the appointments with interventions. Parents especially appreciated immediate help and testing from the doctor.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2399-9772
dc.identifier.olddbid183079
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/166173
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/40415
dc.identifier.urlhttps://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/6/1/e001394
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022081154566
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVahlberg, Tero
dc.okm.discipline3123 Gynaecology and paediatricsen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3123 Naisten- ja lastentauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumbere001394
dc.relation.doi10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001394
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMJ Paediatrics Open
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume6
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/166173
dc.titleAssociating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Vahlberg2022_AssociatingSchoolDoctorInterventions.pdf
Size:
287.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format