The Accuracy of the CBCT‐Based 3‐Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in Autotransplantation

dc.contributor.authorJuslin, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorTeerijoki‐Oksa, Tuija
dc.contributor.authorJääsaari, Päivi
dc.contributor.authorEkholm, Marja
dc.contributor.authorVallittu, Pekka
dc.contributor.authorLassila, Lippo
dc.contributor.authorThorén, Hanna
dc.contributor.organizationfi=InFLAMES Lippulaiva|en=InFLAMES Flagship|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.68445910604
dc.converis.publication-id459072472
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/459072472
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:44:30Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:44:30Z
dc.description.abstract<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study evaluated the accuracy of the CBCT reconstruction model compared to the natural tooth and the accuracy of the replica tooth compared to the natural tooth.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>The hypothesis was that a replica tooth could be used as a surgical guide in autotransplantation.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three teeth were chosen and a CBCT reconstruction model was formed from each tooth. STL-data was transferred to a milling machine and replica teeth were milled from PEEK. A digitized surface model was prepared from the natural and the replica teeth by a stereophotogrammetry scanner. The surface model from the optical scan of the natural tooth was compared to the CBCT reconstruction model and the surface model of the replica tooth. The models were matched on each other, and surface-based rigid registration was performed between the surface models. Distances were calculated and visualized by MATLAB.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The CBCT reconstruction model and the natural tooth were compared. The largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (0.93 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (2.3 mm). When the natural tooth and the replica tooth were compared, the largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (1.5 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (1.9 mm).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A CBCT scan maintains sufficient image quality for tooth autotransplantation planning. The replica tooth corresponded in size and shape to the natural tooth in terms of clinically expected need of precision.<br></p></div>
dc.identifier.eissn2057-4347
dc.identifier.jour-issn2057-4347
dc.identifier.olddbid209626
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/192653
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/49166
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70032
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788387
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJuslin, Jessica
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTeerijoki-Oksa, Tuija
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJääsaari, Päivi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorEkholm, Marja
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVallittu, Pekka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLassila, Lippo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorThoren, Hanna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherWiley
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumbere70032
dc.relation.doi10.1002/cre2.70032
dc.relation.ispartofjournalClinical and Experimental Dental Research
dc.relation.issue6
dc.relation.volume10
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/192653
dc.titleThe Accuracy of the CBCT‐Based 3‐Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in Autotransplantation
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Clinical Exp Dental Res - 2024 - Juslin - The Accuracy of the CBCT‐Based 3‐Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in.pdf
Size:
769.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format