The Social Perception of Microtia and Auricular Reconstruction

dc.contributor.authorNuyen Brian A
dc.contributor.authorKandathil Cherian K
dc.contributor.authorSaltychev Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorFirmin Françoise
dc.contributor.authorMost Sam P
dc.contributor.authorTruong Mai Thy
dc.contributor.organizationfi=fysiatria|en=Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.17712075286
dc.converis.publication-id47025757
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/47025757
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:26:06Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:26:06Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Objectives <br></p><p>To examine the social perception of microtia and quantify the effect of reconstruction on socially perceived attributes.<br></p><p>Methods <br></p><p>Parental consent was obtained for peri-reconstruction photographs in a patient with unilateral grade 3 microtia without an underlying craniofacial syndrome. With computer simulation, the normal, preoperative microtia, and postoperative reconstruction ear were isolated and blended into the oblique and lateral views of that volunteer's face to isolate ear morphology as a variable against a constant facial baseline. These photographs were embedded into Web-based surveys with visual analogue scales to capture social perception data and then were sourced to general population adults.<br></p><p>Results <br></p><p>Survey respondents totaled 631. On average, the face with the microtia ear was perceived to be less friendly (<em>P</em> = .015), less healthy (<em>P</em> = .022), and less successful (<em>P</em> = .005) than the same face with the "normal" ear. There were no statistically significant differences in socially perceived attributes between the face with the normal ear and the face with the reconstructed ear.<br></p><p>Conclusion <br></p><p>This is the first study to examine the social perception consequences of microtia and microtia reconstruction in children. These findings may explain the significant psychosocial distress experienced by these patients by exploring the social perception of specific attributes perceived. Lastly, this study may better inform microtia patients and their physicians on the impact of auricular reconstruction on third party's perception of social attributes.Level of Evidence N/A Laryngoscope, 2020</p>
dc.format.pagerange195
dc.format.pagerange200
dc.identifier.eissn1531-4995
dc.identifier.jour-issn0023-852X
dc.identifier.olddbid205696
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/188723
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/56774
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042822378
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSaltychev, Mikhail
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3125 Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3125 Korva-, nenä- ja kurkkutaudit, silmätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1002/lary.28619
dc.relation.ispartofjournalLaryngoscope
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume131
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188723
dc.titleThe Social Perception of Microtia and Auricular Reconstruction
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Microtia_manuscript_2.15.20.Lscope.clean.pdf
Size:
507.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final Draft