Dose monitoring in pediatric and young adult head and cervical spine CT studies at two emergency duty departments

dc.contributor.authorHannele Niiniviita
dc.contributor.authorTimo Kiljunen
dc.contributor.authorMinna Huuskonen
dc.contributor.authorSimo Teperi
dc.contributor.authorJarmo Kulmala
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biolääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Biomedicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biostatistiikka|en=Biostatistics|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kuvantaminen ja kliininen diagnostiikka|en=Imaging and Clinical Diagnostics|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code2607100
dc.contributor.organization-code2607302
dc.contributor.organization-code2607303
dc.converis.publication-id28553689
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/28553689
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:42:53Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:42:53Z
dc.description.abstract<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>As the number of pediatric computed tomography (CT) imaging is increasing, there is a need for real-time radiation dose monitoring and evaluation of the imaging protocols. The aim of this study was to present the imaging data, patient doses, and observations of pediatric and young adult trauma—and routine head CT and cervical spine CT collected by a dose monitoring software.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patient age, study date, imaging parameters, and patient dose as volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were collected from two emergency departments’ CT scanners for 2-year period. The patients were divided into four age groups (0–5, 6–10, 11–15, and 16–20 years) for statistical analysis and effective dose determination. The 75th percentile doses were evaluated to be used as local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six hundred fifteen trauma head, 318 routine head, and 592 trauma cervical spine CT studies were assessed. All mean CTDIvol values were statistically lower in hospital B (40.3 ± 12.3, 30.03 ± 11.1, and 6.9 ± 3.1 mGy, respectively) than in hospital A (53.0 ± 12.9, 43.2 ± 8.7, and 18.3 ± 7.3 mGy, respectively). Statistically significant differences were observed on scanning length between hospitals and between CTDIvol values when protocol was updated. The 75th percentiles of trauma cervical spine in hospital B can be used as local DRL. Non-optimized protocols were also revealed in hospital A.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Dose monitoring software offers a valuable tool for evaluating the imaging practices and finding non-optimized protocols.</p></div>
dc.format.pagerange153
dc.format.pagerange159
dc.identifier.jour-issn1070-3004
dc.identifier.olddbid178434
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/161528
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/35952
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717984
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorNiiniviita, Hannele
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTeperi, Simo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKulmala, Jarmo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10140-017-1571-x
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEmergency Radiology
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume25
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/161528
dc.titleDose monitoring in pediatric and young adult head and cervical spine CT studies at two emergency duty departments
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
DoseMonitoringProof.pdf
Size:
232.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final draft