Comparison of enzymatic and pH shift methods to extract protein from whole Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) and roach (Rutilus rutilus)

dc.contributor.authorNisov Anni
dc.contributor.authorKakko Tanja
dc.contributor.authorAlakomi Hanna-Leena
dc.contributor.authorLantto Raija
dc.contributor.authorHonkapää Kaisu
dc.contributor.organizationfi=elintarviketieteet|en=Food Sciences|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.15178954341
dc.converis.publication-id67840961
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/67840961
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:38:44Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:38:44Z
dc.description.abstract<p>This study aimed to establish the differences between enzymatically extracted hydrolysates and pH shifted protein isolates from whole Baltic herring and roach in terms of polypeptide patterns, functionality, sensory properties, microbial quality, yield, and composition. Alkaline extraction resulted in the highest yields, whereas the hydrolysates showed the highest protein contents. The hydrolysates showed higher protein solubility (86.0–88.5%) than the protein isolates (5.1–14.5%) as well as the higher foam capacity for Baltic herring. However, for roach, alkaline extracted protein isolates exhibited the highest foam capacity. All hydrolysates showed poor foam stability (0–13%) while the protein isolates showed notably higher stability (30–55%). The hydrolysates showed relatively low bitterness, whereas alkaline extracted roach proteins were perceived as bitter. This study demonstrated that it was possible to produce protein isolates and hydrolysates from whole fish with good microbial quality. However, both processes need to be optimised according to the food application and fish species.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7072
dc.identifier.jour-issn0308-8146
dc.identifier.olddbid177930
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/161024
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/35095
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814621025309?via%3Dihub
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021120158405
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSeppälä, Tanja
dc.okm.discipline1182 Biochemistry, cell and molecular biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1182 Biokemia, solu- ja molekyylibiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber131524
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131524
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFood Chemistry
dc.relation.volume373 B
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/161024
dc.titleComparison of enzymatic and pH shift methods to extract protein from whole Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) and roach (Rutilus rutilus)
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0308814621025309-main.pdf
Size:
1.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF