Validation of powder layering simulation via packing density measurement for laser-based powder bed fusion

dc.contributor.authorHaapa Erik
dc.contributor.authorGopaluni Aditya
dc.contributor.authorPiili Heidi
dc.contributor.authorGanvir Ashish
dc.contributor.authorSalminen Antti
dc.contributor.authorOttelin Juha
dc.contributor.organizationfi=konetekniikka|en=Mechanical Engineering|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.73637165264
dc.converis.publication-id182416735
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/182416735
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T03:17:08Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T03:17:08Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Powder bed fusion using a laser beam (PBF-LB/M) is considered one of the most versatile additive manufacturing methods as the parts printed have high resolution thanks to the low layer thickness used. The powder packing density (<em>PD</em>) of the powder layer has a significant impact on the density, surface roughness and other mechanical properties of the built parts. Due to the difficulty of characterizing the powder bed in situ, simulation has often been used to study the powder behavior on the powder bed. However, in order for the simulation to have practical value, there must be some way of confirming the results via experimental methods, also called validation. The aim of this study was to develop a powder packing density-based validation method for a powder bed simulation. The developed method featured a simplistic "open cup" style sample which traps powder inside for <em>PD</em> measurement. The samples were built with an EOS M 290 PBF-LB/M system using Alloy 718 (also known as "IN718" or "Inconel") powder. Average <em>PD</em> over the five built samples was 52.4 %, with a standard deviation of 0.2 %. The method was used to successfully validate a powder bed simulation with four recoated powder layers, modelled using FLOW-3D DEM simulation software from Flow Science Inc. Similar methods for <em>PD</em> characterization were found in literature, but in many cases the method does not fully correspond to the conditions of a simulated powder bed, the scale is very small, or the reliability of the <em>PD</em> measurement is not confirmed. The method presented in this study corresponds to typical powder bed simulation conditions, while retaining high reliability and repeatability of results.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange012020
dc.identifier.issn1757-8981
dc.identifier.jour-issn1757-8981
dc.identifier.olddbid210472
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/193499
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/56861
dc.identifier.urlhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/1296/1/012020
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790636
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHaapa, Erik
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGopaluni, Aditya
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPiili, Heidi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGanvir, Ashish
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSalminen, Antti
dc.okm.discipline214 Mechanical engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline216 Materials engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline214 Kone- ja valmistustekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline216 Materiaalitekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA4 Conference Article
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.conferenceNordic Laser Materials Processing Conference
dc.relation.doi10.1088/1757-899X/1296/1/012020
dc.relation.ispartofjournalIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
dc.relation.volume1296
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/193499
dc.titleValidation of powder layering simulation via packing density measurement for laser-based powder bed fusion
dc.title.bookNOLAMP- Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference (19TH-NOLAMP-2023) 22/08/2023 - 24/08/2023 Turku, Finland
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Haapa_2023_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Mater._Sci._Eng._1296_012020.pdf
Size:
1.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format