Seismic Monitoring of a Subarctic River: Seasonal Variations in Hydraulics, Sediment Transport, and Ice Dynamics

dc.contributor.authorPolvi LE
dc.contributor.authorDietze M
dc.contributor.authorLotsari E
dc.contributor.authorTurowski JM
dc.contributor.authorLind L
dc.contributor.organizationfi=maantieteen ja geologian laitos|en=Department of Geography and Geology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.23186815876
dc.converis.publication-id52147430
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/52147430
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:20:35Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:20:35Z
dc.description.abstractHigh-latitude rivers are commonly covered by ice for up to one third of the year. Our understanding of the effects of ice on channel morphodynamics and bedload transport is hindered by the difficulties of sensing through the ice and dangers of field work on thin ice or during ice break-up. To avoid this drawback, we used seismic signals to interpret processes and quantify water and sediment fluxes. Our objective was to determine seasonal differences in hydraulics and bedload sediment transport under ice-covered versus open-channel flow conditions using a small seismic network and to provide a first-order estimation of sediment flux in a Fennoscandian river. Our study reach was on a straight, low-gradient section of the Savar River in northern Sweden. Interpretations of seismic signals, from a station 40 m away from the river, and inverted physical models of river stage and bedload flux indicate clear seasonal differences between ice-covered and open-channel flow conditions. Diurnal cycles in seismic signals reflecting turbulence and sediment transport are evident directly after ice break-up. Analysis of seismic signals of ice-cracking support our visual interpretation of ice break-up timing and the main ice break-up mechanism as thermal rather than mechanical. Assuming the bulk of sediment moves during ice break-up and the snowmelt flood, we calculate a minimum annual sediment flux of 56.2 +/- 0.7 t/km(2), which drastically reduces the uncertainty from previous estimates (0-50 t/km(2)) that exclude ice-covered or ice break-up periods.
dc.identifier.jour-issn2169-9003
dc.identifier.olddbid181403
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/164497
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/37942
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042826537
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLotsari, Eliisa
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geosciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1171 Geotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN e2019JF005333
dc.relation.doi10.1029/2019JF005333
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of geophysical research : earth surface
dc.relation.issue7
dc.relation.volume125
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/164497
dc.titleSeismic Monitoring of a Subarctic River: Seasonal Variations in Hydraulics, Sediment Transport, and Ice Dynamics
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
2019JF005333.pdf
Size:
11.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF