Deep learning‐based 3D classification of head and neck cancer PET/MRI: Radiologist comparison and Grad‐CAM interpretability

dc.contributor.authorLiedes, Joonas
dc.contributor.authorHirvonen, Jussi
dc.contributor.authorRainio, Oona
dc.contributor.authorMurtojärvi, Sarita
dc.contributor.authorMalaspina, Simona
dc.contributor.authorKlén, Riku
dc.contributor.authorKemppainen, Jukka
dc.contributor.organizationfi=PET-keskus|en=Turku PET Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=korva-, nenä-, ja kurkkutautioppi|en=Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kuvantaminen ja kliininen diagnostiikka|en=Imaging and Clinical Diagnostics|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.14646305228
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.69079168212
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.93326749889
dc.contributor.organization-code2609810
dc.contributor.organization-code2609820
dc.converis.publication-id504538722
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/504538722
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T13:33:27Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T13:33:27Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Purpose:<br></p><p> To develop and evaluate a three-dimensional convolutional neural network for automated classification of PET/MRI images in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, assessing its performance against radiologist interpretation and its potential as a diagnostic aid.<br><br>Methods:<br></p><p> Data from 202 patients with HNC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/MRI were used to train and validate PET-, MRI-, and PET/MRI-based models. Of these data, 101 patients were labelled as positive in terms of having HNC, and 101 patients as negative. An additional test set of 20 patients was also evaluated, where 10 patients were labelled as positive and 10 as negative. The model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC. Grad-CAM was utilised to improve interpretability and classification results on the test set were compared with a radiologist.<br><br>Results:<br>The PET-based model achieved an AUC of 0.92 on the test set, with an accuracy of 90%, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. PET/MRI and MRI-based models underperformed relative to the PET-based model. The radiologist achieved perfect classification accuracy. Analysis of Grad-CAM showed that the model classifications are based on real areas of interest. In addition, it gave valuable insight into using similar systems in identifying false positive findings.<br><br>Conclusion:<br></p><p> The PET-based model demonstrated high sensitivity, indicating its potential as a pre-screening tool for HNC. However, specificity requires improvement to reduce false-positive rates. Enhanced datasets and refinement of model architecture will be crucial before clinical adoption. Grad-CAM provides valuable insights into model decisions, aiding clinical integration.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1475-097X
dc.identifier.jour-issn1475-0961
dc.identifier.olddbid213086
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/196104
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54751
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.70030
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601216051
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLiedes, Joonas
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHirvonen, Jussi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRainio, Oona
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMurtojärvi, Sarita
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMalaspina, Simona
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKlén, Riku
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKemppainen, Jukka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3122 Cancersen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3122 Syöpätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherWiley
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumbere70030
dc.relation.doi10.1111/cpf.70030
dc.relation.ispartofjournalClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
dc.relation.issue5
dc.relation.volume45
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/196104
dc.titleDeep learning‐based 3D classification of head and neck cancer PET/MRI: Radiologist comparison and Grad‐CAM interpretability
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Liedes_etal_deep_learning-based_2025.pdf
Size:
2.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format