Workplace information literacy: Measures and methodological challenges

dc.contributor.authorWidén Gunilla
dc.contributor.authorAhmad Farhan
dc.contributor.authorNikou Shahrokh
dc.contributor.authorRyan Bruce
dc.contributor.authorCruickshank Peter
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tietojärjestelmätiede|en=Information Systems Science|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.70128852004
dc.converis.publication-id66367656
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/66367656
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T01:17:38Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T01:17:38Z
dc.description.abstract<ul><li>This paper focuses information literacy (IL) from a methodological perspective, addressing quantitative IL measures, suitable for evaluating the role of IL in supporting work activities. So far, IL in workplace contexts has mostly been studied using qualitative methods, designed for studying situational and context-dependent practices. Therefore it is important to explore how quantitative measures could be used to bring forward the relation between IL and organisational outcomes, that is the assessment of the impact of IL in workplace contexts. Quantitative research into IL is not unknown, but has been mainly developed in higher education, in order to measure students' abilities to make use of information. This paper brings forward three separate studies, conducted by the authors, highlighting different workplace contexts: small and medium enterprises; universities; and community councils. The common approach is that survey instruments were used to measure IL and its impact in these organisational contexts. The methodological implementations and insights are presented and combined, and methodological strengths and challenges are discussed, with the aims of (1) building knowledge about IL measures in workplace settings that is currently lacking, (2) finding additional measures for the complex IL construct, and (3) considering the scope of the practices that can be measured. The paper highlights the complexity of studying the impacts of IL in workplace contexts, and the importance of using multiple methods. It constitutes an important step towards a more unified understanding of how to study workplace IL.</li></ul>
dc.format.pagerange26
dc.format.pagerange44
dc.identifier.jour-issn1750-5968
dc.identifier.olddbid207347
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/190374
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/51045
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/JIL/article/view/PRA-V15-I2-2
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021093048395
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorAhmad, Farhan
dc.okm.discipline113 Computer and information sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline512 Business and managementen_GB
dc.okm.discipline518 Media and communicationsen_GB
dc.okm.discipline113 Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline512 Liiketaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline518 Media- ja viestintätieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherCILIP
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.11645/15.2.2812
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Information Literacy
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume15
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/190374
dc.titleWorkplace information literacy: Measures and methodological challenges
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
IL Methodologies.pdf
Size:
364.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format