Dosimetric Comparison and Evaluation of 4 Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Techniques for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
| dc.contributor.author | Jan Seppälä | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sami Suilamo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mikko Tenhunen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Liisa Sailas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Heli Virsunen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Erna Kaleva | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jani Keyriläinen | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=fysiikan ja tähtitieteen laitos|en=Department of Physics and Astronomy| | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha| | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.55477946762 | |
| dc.converis.publication-id | 18469052 | |
| dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/18469052 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-28T13:38:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-28T13:38:07Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | <p> Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare dosimetric characteristics, monitor unit, and delivery efficiency of 4 different stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer. Methods: This study included 8 patients with localized prostate cancer. Dosimetric assets of 4 delivery techniques for stereotactic body radiotherapy were evaluated: robotic CyberKnife, noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and 2 intensity-modulated arc therapy techniques (RapidArc and Elekta volumetric-modulated arc therapy). All the plans had equal treatment margins and a prescription dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. </p><p>Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in homogeneity index and mean doses of bladder wall and penile bulb, all of which were highest with CyberKnife. No significant differences were observed in the mean doses of rectum, with values of 15.2+ 2.6, 13.3 +2.6, 13.1 +2.8, and 13.8 +1.6 Gy with CyberKnife, RapidArc, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy, respectively. The highest dose conformity was realized with RapidArc. The dose coverage of the planning target volume was lowest with noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Treatment times and number of monitor units were largest with CyberKnife (on average 34.0 + 5.0 minutes and 8704 + 1449 monitor units) and least with intensity-modulated arc therapy techniques (on average 5.1 + 1.1 minutes and 2270 + 497 monitor units).</p><p>Conclusion: Compared to CyberKnife, the RapidArc, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy produced treatment plans with similar dosimetric quality, with RapidArc achieving the highest dose conformity. Overall, the dosimetric differences between the studied techniques were marginal, and thus, the choice of the technique should rather focus on the delivery accuracies and dose delivery times.<br /></p> | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 238 | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 245 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1533-0338 | |
| dc.identifier.jour-issn | 1533-0338 | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 183258 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/166352 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/58331 | |
| dc.identifier.url | http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1533034616682156 | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042716359 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Keyriläinen, Jani | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Dataimport, tyks, vsshp | |
| dc.okm.discipline | 217 Medical engineering | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 3122 Cancers | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 217 Lääketieteen tekniikka | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.discipline | 3122 Syöpätaudit | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.internationalcopublication | not an international co-publication | |
| dc.okm.internationality | International publication | |
| dc.okm.type | A1 ScientificArticle | |
| dc.publisher | Sage Publications, Inc. | |
| dc.publisher.country | United States | en_GB |
| dc.publisher.country | Yhdysvallat (USA) | fi_FI |
| dc.publisher.country-code | US | |
| dc.relation.doi | 10.1177/1533034616682156 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment | |
| dc.relation.issue | 2 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 16 | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/166352 | |
| dc.title | Dosimetric Comparison and Evaluation of 4 Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Techniques for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer | |
| dc.year.issued | 2017 |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
- Name:
- 1533034616682156.pdf
- Size:
- 752.27 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Publisher's version