Hybrid FE-ML model for turning of 42CrMo4 steel

dc.contributor.authorLaakso
dc.contributor.authorSampsa Vili Antero
dc.contributor.authorMityakov, Andrey
dc.contributor.authorNiinimäki, Tom
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro
dc.contributor.authorKandice Suane Barros
dc.contributor.authorBessa, Wallace Moreira
dc.contributor.organizationfi=konetekniikka|en=Mechanical Engineering|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.73637165264
dc.contributor.organization-code2610201
dc.converis.publication-id458928591
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/458928591
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T01:18:59Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T01:18:59Z
dc.description.abstractMetal cutting processes contribute significant share of the added value of industrial products. The need for machining has grown exponentially with increasing demands for quality and accuracy, and despite of more than a century of research in the field, there are no reliable and accurate models that describe all the physical phenomena needed to optimize the machining processes. The scientific community has begun to explore hybrid methods instead of expanding the capabilities of individual modelling schemes, which has been more efficient than efficacious direction. Following this trend, we propose a hybrid finite element — machine learning method (FEML) for modelling metal cutting. The advantages of the FEML method are reduced need for experimental data, reduced computational time and improved prediction accuracy. This paper describes the FEML model, which uses a Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) formulation and deep neural networks (DNN) from the TensorFlow Python library. The machining experiments include forces, chip morphology and surface roughness. The experimental data was divided into training dataset and validation dataset to confirm the model predictions outside the experimental data range. The hybrid FEML model outperformed the DNN and FEM models independently, by reducing the computational time, improving the average prediction error from 23% to 13% and reduced the need for experimental data by half.
dc.format.pagerange333
dc.format.pagerange346
dc.identifier.eissn1878-0016
dc.identifier.jour-issn1755-5817
dc.identifier.olddbid207378
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/190405
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/51070
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.003
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787655
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLaakso, Sampsa
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMityakov, Andrey
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorNiinimäki, Tom
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBarros Ribeiro, Kandice
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMoreira Bessa, Wallace
dc.okm.discipline214 Mechanical engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline214 Kone- ja valmistustekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.003
dc.relation.ispartofjournalCIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
dc.relation.volume55
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/190405
dc.titleHybrid FE-ML model for turning of 42CrMo4 steel
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S1755581724001597-main.pdf
Size:
4.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format