Deception as Process and Content: Mapping Research on Deception Published in SJR’s Top-Ranked Communication Studies Journals

dc.contributor.authorCyrek
dc.contributor.authorBarbara
dc.contributor.authorPopiołek
dc.contributor.authorMalwina
dc.contributor.authorPeltonen
dc.contributor.authorJenna
dc.contributor.authorCorbo
dc.contributor.authorLeslie
dc.contributor.authorGorbachevsky
dc.contributor.authorMaxim
dc.contributor.organizationfi=digitaalisen kulttuurin, maiseman ja kulttuuriperinnön tutkimus|en=Degree Programme in Digital Culture, Landscape and Cultural Heritage|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.77579741941
dc.converis.publication-id506083529
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/506083529
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T12:13:53Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T12:13:53Z
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper reviews the recent literature in the field of communication sciences in terms of analyzing the research on deception, misinformation, and information misuse. A scoping review of the literature presented here focuses on deception studies published in top SJR journals in the years 2020–2022. Two research approaches can be distinguished in this field: analyzing the process or analyzing the content. For the most part, researchers analyze deception from the perspective of the communication process, there are far fewer studies on the content of deceptive messages. Original papers comprise the majority of studies on deception in the communications field, and, among them, dominate the research on social media. In recent years, research on instant messaging services such as WhatsApp has been increasingly popular, but there has been a lack of studies on Telegram, which is growing in importance for communication processes. This work contributes to the literature on deception by introducing a novel literature sampling method and investigating two dimensions of deception analysis, of which one is far more represented in communication studies.</p>
dc.format.pagerange105
dc.format.pagerange126
dc.identifier.jour-issn0208-7375
dc.identifier.olddbid212248
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/195266
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/43801
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202535
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601215659
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPeltonen, Jenna
dc.okm.discipline616 Other humanitiesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline616 Muut humanistiset tieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherPolish Political science Yearbook
dc.publisher.countryPolanden_GB
dc.publisher.countryPuolafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codePL
dc.relation.doi10.15804/ppsy202535
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPolish Political Science Yearbook
dc.relation.issue3
dc.relation.volume54
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/195266
dc.titleDeception as Process and Content: Mapping Research on Deception Published in SJR’s Top-Ranked Communication Studies Journals
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
ppsy202535.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format