Visual Expertise in History: Historians’ and Novices’ Visual Processing and Interpretation of Historical Images

dc.contributor.authorPuurtinen, Marjaana
dc.contributor.authorKaakinen, Johanna K.
dc.contributor.authorJarodzka, Halzska
dc.contributor.organizationfi=opettajankoulutuslaitos (Turku)|en=Department of Teacher Education (Turku)|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykologia|en=Psychology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.17986072860
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.15586825505
dc.converis.publication-id516253425
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/516253425
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-24T20:05:31Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Drawing on expertise research and scene perception studies, this study investigates the characteristics of visual expertise in the domain of history by examining historians’ and novices’ visual processing and task performance in an image integration task. Task complexity was manipulated by altering the ease of identifying the topic depicted in a series of historical images. Historians (n = 40) and novices (n = 40) were shown a series of black-and-white images. Their eye movements were recorded, and each participant identified a topic for each series. Their written responses were coded for appropriateness and whether they described the topic as part of a historical process. The results showed that compared to novices, historians exhibited more consistent gaze behavior for each series of images, indicating a systematic approach to interpreting them. Furthermore, novices’ fixation durations increased, and the number of fixations tended to decrease from the first to the final image, suggesting that their gaze became more focused only for the later images. Expertise also affected task performance: In the case of a more challenging set of images, historians provided more appropriate topic answers and interpreted the topics as part of a historical process, indicating that they were able to situate even the more complex series within a meaningful bigger picture. Thus, even in the ill-structured domain of history, domain expertise induces differences in the visual processing and interpretation of domain-related images compared to lack of such expertise.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange24
dc.format.pagerange1
dc.identifier.eissn2573-2773
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/59398
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.journalofexpertise.org/articles/volume9_issue1/JoE_9_1_Puuriten_etal.html
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026042333192
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPuurtinen, Marjaana
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKaakinen, Johanna
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline615 History and archaeologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline615 Historia ja arkeologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMichigan State University, Department of Psychology
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of expertise
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume9
dc.titleVisual Expertise in History: Historians’ and Novices’ Visual Processing and Interpretation of Historical Images
dc.year.issued2026

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
JoE_9_1_Puuriten_etal.pdf
Size:
901.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format