The past and the present in decision-making: the use of conspecific and heterospecific cues in nest site selection

dc.contributor.authorSami M. Kivelä
dc.contributor.authorJanne-Tuomas Seppänen
dc.contributor.authorOtso Ovaskainen
dc.contributor.authorBlandine Doligez
dc.contributor.authorLars Gustafsson
dc.contributor.authorMikko Mönkkönen
dc.contributor.authorJukka T. Forsman
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code2606402
dc.converis.publication-id2232104
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/2232104
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T21:28:53Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T21:28:53Z
dc.description.abstract<p> Nest-site selection significantly affects fitness, so adaptations for assessment of the qualities of available sites are expected. The assessment may be based on personal or social information, social information referring to the observed location and performance of both con- and heterospecific individuals. Contrary to large-scale breeding habitat selection, small-scale nest-site selection within habitat patches is insufficiently understood. We analyzed nest-site selection in the migratory collared flycatcher <em>Ficedula albicollis</em> in relation to present and past cues provided by conspecifics and by resident tits within habitat patches by using long-term data. Collared flycatchers preferred nest boxes that were occupied by conspecifics in the previous year. This preference was strongest in breeding pairs where both individuals bred in the same forest patch in the previous year. The results also suggest preference for nest boxes close to boxes where conspecifics had a high breeding success in the previous year, and for nest boxes which are presently surrounded by a high number of breeding great tits <em>Parus major</em>. The results indicate social information use in nest-site selection at a small spatial scale, where collared flycatchers use conspecific cues with a time lag of one year and heterospecific cues instantly.</p>
dc.format.pagerange3428
dc.format.pagerange3439
dc.identifier.jour-issn0012-9658
dc.identifier.olddbid200474
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/183501
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/46703
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042714528
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorForsman, Jukka
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.relation.doi10.1890/13-2103.1
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEcology
dc.relation.issue12
dc.relation.volume95
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/183501
dc.titleThe past and the present in decision-making: the use of conspecific and heterospecific cues in nest site selection
dc.year.issued2014

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Kivelä et al. 2014_Ecology.pdf
Size:
652.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Copyright by the Ecological Society of America. Ecology 95:3428–3439