Why do some research articles receive more online attention and higher altmetrics? Reasons for online success according to the authors

dc.contributor.authorKim Holmberg
dc.contributor.authorJulia Vainio
dc.contributor.organizationfi=koulutussosiologian tutkimuskeskus RUSE|en=Research Unit for the Sociology of Education (RUSE)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.23782222568
dc.contributor.organization-code2609900
dc.converis.publication-id30741256
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/30741256
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T12:16:22Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T12:16:22Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Recent altmetrics research has started to investigate the meaning of altmetrics and whether altmetrics could reveal something about the attention or impact connected to research. This research continues this line of investigations and studies reasons for why some research has received significant online attention in one or both of two social media services; Twitter or Mendeley. This research investigated Finnish researchers’ opinions about the reasons for why their research had received significant online attention and if the attention received could reflect scientific or societal impact of their research. Furthermore it was studied whether the authors of the papers with significant online attention actively followed how their papers were shared or discussed online and if the authors thought that the online attention increased either the scientific or societal impact of their work. Based on the findings it can be stated that the level of online attention received is a sum of many factors and that there are also specific differences between the platforms where the attention has been received. For the articles that had received significant attention on Mendeley the reasons for that attention were more often seen as due to an academic audience, while the situation was reverse on Twitter, with the majority of reasons for the attention being linked to a wider audience. Similar trend could be seen when asked about whether the online attention could reflect scientific or societal impact, although a clear consensus about whether online attention could reflect any type of impact at all could not be reached.<br /></p>
dc.format.pagerange435
dc.format.pagerange447
dc.identifier.eissn1588-2861
dc.identifier.jour-issn0138-9130
dc.identifier.olddbid174358
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/157452
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/34171
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042719014
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHolmberg, Kim
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVainio, Julia
dc.okm.discipline520 Other social sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline520 Muut yhteiskuntatieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.publisher.countryHungaryen_GB
dc.publisher.countryUnkarifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeHU
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s11192-018-2710-1
dc.relation.ispartofjournalScientometrics
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume116
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/157452
dc.titleWhy do some research articles receive more online attention and higher altmetrics? Reasons for online success according to the authors
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
SCIEM draft1.pdf
Size:
687.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final draft