Parastomal Hernia: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study Comparing Different Techniques with Long-Term Follow-Up

dc.contributor.authorMäkäräinen-Uhlback Elisa
dc.contributor.authorVironen Jaana
dc.contributor.authorFalenius Ville
dc.contributor.authorNordström Pia
dc.contributor.authorVälikoski Anu
dc.contributor.authorKössi Jyrki
dc.contributor.authorKechagias Aristotelis
dc.contributor.authorKalliala Maija
dc.contributor.authorMattila Anne
dc.contributor.authorRantanen Tuomo
dc.contributor.authorScheinin Tom
dc.contributor.authorOhtonen Pasi
dc.contributor.authorRautio Tero
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.converis.publication-id53430010
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/53430010
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:10:14Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:10:14Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Background <br></p><p>Parastomal hernia repair is a complex surgical procedure with high recurrence and complication rates. This retrospective nationwide cohort study presents the results of different parastomal hernia repair techniques in Finland. </p><p>Methods <br></p><p>All patients who underwent a primary end ostomy parastomal hernia repair in the nine participating hospitals during 2007-2017 were included in the study. The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were complications and re-operation rate. <br></p><p>Results <br></p><p>In total, 235 primary elective parastomal hernia repairs were performed in five university hospitals and four central hospitals in Finland during 2007-2017. The major techniques used were the Sugarbaker (38.8%), keyhole (16.3%), and sandwich techniques (15.4%). In addition, a specific intra-abdominal keyhole technique with a funnel-shaped mesh was utilized in 8.3% of the techniques; other parastomal hernia repair techniques were used in 21.3% of the cases. The median follow-up time was 39.0 months (0-146, SD 35.3). The recurrence rates after the keyhole, Sugarbaker, sandwich, specific funnel-shaped mesh, and other techniques were 35.9%, 21.5%, 13.5%, 15%, and 35.3%, respectively. The overall re-operation rate was 20.4%, while complications occurred in 26.3% of patients. <br></p><p>Conclusion <br></p><p>The recurrence rate after parastomal hernia repair is unacceptable in this nationwide cohort study. As PSH repair volumes are low, further multinational, randomized controlled trials and hernia registry data are needed to improve the results.</p>
dc.format.pagerange1742
dc.format.pagerange1749
dc.identifier.jour-issn0364-2313
dc.identifier.olddbid180202
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/163296
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/38121
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021093048599
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s00268-021-05990-z
dc.relation.ispartofjournalWorld Journal of Surgery
dc.relation.volume45
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/163296
dc.titleParastomal Hernia: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study Comparing Different Techniques with Long-Term Follow-Up
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck2021_Article_ParastomalHerniaARetrospective.pdf
Size:
404.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version