The Conflict Between Freedom of Speech and Freedom from Discrimination in Social Media Platforms : How “Free Speech Absolutism” Threatens Freedom from Discrimination on Twitter?
Kulmala, Maria (2023-03-13)
The Conflict Between Freedom of Speech and Freedom from Discrimination in Social Media Platforms : How “Free Speech Absolutism” Threatens Freedom from Discrimination on Twitter?
Kulmala, Maria
(13.03.2023)
Julkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.
suljettu
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2023040334784
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2023040334784
Tiivistelmä
This thesis researches the problematic relationship between freedom of expression and freedom from discrimination in social media platforms. The thesis approach is socio-legal mixed with empirical methods. The motivation of the thesis is the recent buyout of Twitter by Elon Musk and the ‘free speech absolutism’ -policy that Musk and his fans support.
This thesis demonstrates how such policy can harm society, especially underprivileged people, and analyses the possible consequences if such policy is widely accepted. The intention might be good when people can practice their right to freedom of expression to its full potential, but the reality is more complicated.
In the last chapter, this thesis gives recommendations on how restrictions to freedom of expression online could be regulated effectively with shared responsibility between government and private companies. It is not an ideal situation that only private companies with financial perspective are the ones who decide which kind of content is allowed and which is prohibited.
This thesis demonstrates how such policy can harm society, especially underprivileged people, and analyses the possible consequences if such policy is widely accepted. The intention might be good when people can practice their right to freedom of expression to its full potential, but the reality is more complicated.
In the last chapter, this thesis gives recommendations on how restrictions to freedom of expression online could be regulated effectively with shared responsibility between government and private companies. It is not an ideal situation that only private companies with financial perspective are the ones who decide which kind of content is allowed and which is prohibited.
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineisto, joilla on samankaltaisia nimekkeitä, tekijöitä tai asiasanoja.
-
Risk of Recommendations : Human Rights Perspective on the Recommender Systems of Social Media Platforms
Valtimo, Heini (18.04.2023)This thesis examines the recommender systems of social media platforms and whether those are risking human rights. The issue is analysed from the perspective of the right not to be manipulated, which is considered to be ...suljettu -
The dilemma of a responsible intermediary : why it is time to reassess the European intermediary liability regime
Toivonen, Janna (24.04.2019)This thesis contextualizes the latest developments in the field of intermediary liability regulation within the European Union. Special focus is given to online platforms, such as social networks and search engines, which ...suljettu -
Right to Be Forgotten in Spent Criminal Convictions
Faisal, Kamrul (13.03.2020)Individual’s past personal data proved to have unimaginable impact on his or her present and the future in particular the spent criminal convicts’ faux pas committed in the past might trap oneself to an unchangeable present ...avoin