Digital Voting Systems
| dc.contributor.author | Godapitiya Hewage, Buddhini | |
| dc.contributor.department | fi=Matematiikan ja tilastotieteen laitos|en=Department of Mathematics and Statistics| | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | fi=Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta|en=Faculty of Science| | |
| dc.contributor.studysubject | fi=Matematiikka|en=Mathematics| | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-16T22:04:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-16T22:04:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-12 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Digital voting systems represent a significant evolution in the democratic process, offering the potential to improve accessibility, efficiency, and trans- parency in elections. Despite technological advances, widespread adoption remains limited due to concerns about security, usability, and practical de- ployment. This thesis examines three prominent digital voting systems — Helios, Estonian i-Voting, and Voatz — to assess their readiness for large- scale democratic use. The research addresses key questions regarding the security and crypto- graphic robustness, usability and accessibility, and practical deployment char- acteristics of these systems. A qualitative comparative case study method- ology is employed, drawing on published literature, technical documentation, security audits, and real-world deployment reports. Each system is analysed across multiple dimensions, including privacy, integrity, verifiability, coercion resistance, voter experience, infrastructure requirements, and operational per- formance. Findings highlight that while each system demonstrates innovative solu- tions to digital voting challenges, significant trade-offs exist between security, usability, and scalability. Helios provides strong theoretical guarantees and transparency in organizational elections, but practical usability remains a con- cern. Estonian i-Voting demonstrates the feasibility of national-scale internet voting supported by robust digital identity infrastructure, yet concerns about coercion and system transparency persist. Voatz illustrates the potential of mobile blockchain-based voting but faces critical security vulnerabilities and limited public trust. This study contributes a systematic, multi-dimensional comparison of dig- ital voting systems, providing insights for policymakers, election administra- tors, and researchers. By evaluating existing implementations in terms of security, usability, and deployment readiness, the thesis informs future devel- opment and adoption strategies for digital voting technologies. | |
| dc.format.extent | 50 | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 211687 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/194706 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/17060 | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe20251216120545 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | fi=Julkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.|en=This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.| | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | avoin | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/194706 | |
| dc.subject | Keywords: Digital Voting, E-Voting Systems, Helios, Estonian i-Voting, Voatz. | |
| dc.title | Digital Voting Systems | |
| dc.type.ontasot | fi=Pro gradu -tutkielma|en=Master's thesis| |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
- Name:
- Digital%20Voting%20Systems%20MSc%20Thesis.pdf
- Size:
- 463.83 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format