Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Identification of Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorMotavaselian, Mohsen
dc.contributor.organizationfi=sydäntutkimuskeskus|en=Cardiovascular Medicine (CAPC)|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=väestötutkimuskeskus|en=Centre for Population Health Research (POP Centre)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.35734063924
dc.contributor.organization-code2607008
dc.converis.publication-id393324709
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/393324709
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T01:06:09Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T01:06:09Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Introduction: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is known as a common cause of acute abdominal complaints in the emer-gency department (ED). The modality of choice for the diagnosis of SBO has not yet been established.  This systematicreview and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.</p><p>Methods: Sys-tematic search was performed on five electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Embase, andCochrane Library, and the retrieval period was from the inception of each database to November 2023.  The quality ofthe included studies were investigated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled values of diagnostic characteristics for ultrasonography were estimated using meta-Disc and Stata statistical soft-ware.Results:Twenty-one studies with a total of 1977 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary ROC curve of ultrasonography for diagnosing SBO were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95), 0.8 (95%CI: 0.77–0.83), 5.69 (95% CI: 3.64–8.89), 0.1 (95% CI: 0.07–0.16), 83.51 (95% CI: 18.12–182.91) and 0.96, respectively.</p><p>Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis showed that the utilization of ultrasonography holds promise as a diagnosticimaging for SBO with high accuracy.  However, additional worldwide studies are essential to get more evidence on thevalue of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.</p><p><br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2645-4904
dc.identifier.jour-issn2645-4904
dc.identifier.olddbid207019
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/190046
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/49936
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2265
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082791474
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorAminpour, Solmaz
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3121 Internal medicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3121 Sisätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
dc.publisher.countryIran, Islamic Republic ofen_GB
dc.publisher.countryIranfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeIR
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN e33
dc.relation.doi10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2265
dc.relation.ispartofjournalArchives of Academic Emergency Medicine
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume12
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/190046
dc.titleDiagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Identification of Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
2265.pdf
Size:
1.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format