Prothrombin complex concentrate in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorRoman M
dc.contributor.authorBiancari F
dc.contributor.authorAhmed AB
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal S
dc.contributor.authorHadjinikolaou L
dc.contributor.authorAl-Sarraf A
dc.contributor.authorTsang G
dc.contributor.authorOo AY
dc.contributor.authorField M
dc.contributor.authorSantini F
dc.contributor.authorMariscalco G
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kirurgia|en=Surgery|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code2607309
dc.converis.publication-id37011463
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/37011463
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:01:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:01:19Z
dc.description.abstractProthrombin complex concentrate (PCC) has recently emerged as effective alternative to fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in treating excessive perioperative bleeding. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PCC administration as first-line treatment for coagulopathy following adult cardiac surgery.\nWe searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to the end of March 2018 to identify eligible articles. Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery and receiving perioperative PCC were compared to those receiving FFP.\nA total of 861 adult patients from 4 studies were retrieved. No randomized studies were identified. Pooled odds ratio (OR) showed that PCC cohort was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of RBC transfusion (OR: 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-3.40) and units of RBC received (OR: 1.34; 95%CI: 0.78-1.90). No differences were observed between the groups for re-exploration for bleeding (OR: 1.09; 95%CI: 0.66-1.82), chest drain output at 24 hours (OR: 66.36; 95%CI: -82.40-216.11), hospital mortality (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.59-1.49), stroke (OR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.41-1.56), and occurrence of acute kidney injury (OR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.58-1.12). A trend toward increased risk of renal replacement therapy was observed in the PCC group (OR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.16-1.02).\nIn patients with significant bleeding following cardiac surgery, PCC administration seems to be more effective than FFP in reducing perioperative blood transfusions. No additional risks of thromboembolic events or other adverse reactions were observed. Randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively establish the safety of PCC in cardiac surgery.
dc.format.pagerange1275
dc.format.pagerange1283
dc.identifier.eissn1552-6259
dc.identifier.jour-issn0003-4975
dc.identifier.olddbid179148
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/162242
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/36761
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042720327
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBiancari, Fausto
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.013
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
dc.relation.volume107
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/162242
dc.titleProthrombin complex concentrate in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Revised PCC paper- final version R3.docx
Size:
65.81 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Final draft