Life Cycle Assessment of Metal Part Repair Using Directed Energy Deposition : A Comparison Between Arc- and Laser-Based Methods
avoin
Julkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.
Lataukset555
Pysyvä osoite
Verkkojulkaisu
DOI
Tiivistelmä
This bachelor’s thesis investigates the environmental performance of metal part repair using Directed Energy Deposition (DED), focusing on a comparison between arc-based (DED-Arc) and laser-based (DED-LB) methods. The analysis is based on a process-phase life cycle assessment (LCA), using energy consumption, material efficiency, and shielding gas use as key indicators. A real-world case involving the DED-LB repair of a hydraulic cylinder rod is used as a reference, with the DED-Arc scenario modeled using literature-based data under comparable conditions. The thesis also outlines the main process steps involved in DED-based repair, including surface preparation, material deposition, and post-processing, providing technical context for the environmental assessment. The findings indicate that the laser-based method resulted in significantly lower energy consumption and material losses compared to the arc-based alternative, primarily due to reduced overbuild and post-processing requirements. However, DED-LB also required substantially more shielding gas. The study highlights that environmental advantages depend strongly on part geometry, deposition volume, and process planning. While DED-LB demonstrated higher resource efficiency in the case studied, the results are not universally generalizable. The thesis underscores the importance of context-specific process selection in sustainable repair operations and encourages the integration of simplified LCA tools into industrial decision-making, while also recognizing their inherent limitations.